<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Most ideal size for your Web Site?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinboss.com/blog/most-ideal-size-for-your-web-site/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinboss.com/blog/most-ideal-size-for-your-web-site/</link>
	<description>Website Design, Development, SEO and Marketing in the Allentown, Bethlehem and Easton areas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 13:31:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinboss.com/blog/most-ideal-size-for-your-web-site/comment-page-1/#comment-2688</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 13:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinboss.net/?p=20#comment-2688</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Hollomon</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinboss.com/blog/most-ideal-size-for-your-web-site/comment-page-1/#comment-2687</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Hollomon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 03:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinboss.net/?p=20#comment-2687</guid>
		<description>Valid point, but difficult to put into practice on eCommerce or showcase sites where lots of graphical elements are vital to the look and feel. I used to do lots of fluid designs. You can use CSS to constrain them so they don&#039;t stretch to ridiculous limits on huge monitors where the browsing window is maximized. But I found that my clients simply could not wrap their heads around the graphics that will work on a flex display without leaving acres of white space at high res. They couldn&#039;t manage and update the site on their own, even if they had a comercial artist on staff..

In fact, I abandoned flex width on my own site (which is desperately in need of an update) because I just didn&#039;t have time to produce the panoramic graphics that will fill a slide show window when it&#039;s squished into a 800 x 600 res screen and still fill it without excess white space when it&#039;s running at 1600 x 1200.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Valid point, but difficult to put into practice on eCommerce or showcase sites where lots of graphical elements are vital to the look and feel. I used to do lots of fluid designs. You can use CSS to constrain them so they don&#8217;t stretch to ridiculous limits on huge monitors where the browsing window is maximized. But I found that my clients simply could not wrap their heads around the graphics that will work on a flex display without leaving acres of white space at high res. They couldn&#8217;t manage and update the site on their own, even if they had a comercial artist on staff..</p>
<p>In fact, I abandoned flex width on my own site (which is desperately in need of an update) because I just didn&#8217;t have time to produce the panoramic graphics that will fill a slide show window when it&#8217;s squished into a 800 x 600 res screen and still fill it without excess white space when it&#8217;s running at 1600 x 1200.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon - SEO Manchester</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinboss.com/blog/most-ideal-size-for-your-web-site/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon - SEO Manchester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinboss.net/?p=20#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Great article, it&#039;s so good to have this data, I keep telling my clients that 800x600 is in the past and some don&#039;t believe me. I can not point them to your website...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, it&#8217;s so good to have this data, I keep telling my clients that 800&#215;600 is in the past and some don&#8217;t believe me. I can not point them to your website&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinboss.com/blog/most-ideal-size-for-your-web-site/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinboss.net/?p=20#comment-70</guid>
		<description>Ignorance is a terrible thing, it&#039;s what has given us flat panel monitors and worse... WIDE screen flat panel monitors. People who buy an off-the-shelf computer don&#039;t care about quality, and unfortunately this accounts for most people. So it really doesn&#039;t matter how you design a website because your audience will be too stupid to care or to know any better.

If you do not have a CRT monitor and a computer with a video card then you can&#039;t see any website as it was meant to be seen by the web designer.

No flat panel monitor can even come close to the number of colors a CRT monitor can display. People have been marketed to rather successfully. They&#039;ve been told that they don&#039;t have enough room for a CRT monitor.

Advertisers and marketers give thanks everyday for public education. Without it we wouldn&#039;t have nearly the number of easily fooled people that we have in society today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ignorance is a terrible thing, it&#8217;s what has given us flat panel monitors and worse&#8230; WIDE screen flat panel monitors. People who buy an off-the-shelf computer don&#8217;t care about quality, and unfortunately this accounts for most people. So it really doesn&#8217;t matter how you design a website because your audience will be too stupid to care or to know any better.</p>
<p>If you do not have a CRT monitor and a computer with a video card then you can&#8217;t see any website as it was meant to be seen by the web designer.</p>
<p>No flat panel monitor can even come close to the number of colors a CRT monitor can display. People have been marketed to rather successfully. They&#8217;ve been told that they don&#8217;t have enough room for a CRT monitor.</p>
<p>Advertisers and marketers give thanks everyday for public education. Without it we wouldn&#8217;t have nearly the number of easily fooled people that we have in society today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: double glazing uk</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinboss.com/blog/most-ideal-size-for-your-web-site/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>double glazing uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 11:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinboss.net/?p=20#comment-69</guid>
		<description>Surfing on a movie screen..haha..that&#039;s a good one. I think it is best to keep it simple with the 800 x 600 for the website to fit on most computer screens, plus people will be familiar with the size of the layout on most computers anywhere.

I say stick with the 800 x 600 for now I say.

Best of luck, from Dave, your fave &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sehbac.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;double glazing&lt;/a&gt; guy :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surfing on a movie screen..haha..that&#8217;s a good one. I think it is best to keep it simple with the 800 x 600 for the website to fit on most computer screens, plus people will be familiar with the size of the layout on most computers anywhere.</p>
<p>I say stick with the 800 x 600 for now I say.</p>
<p>Best of luck, from Dave, your fave <a href="http://www.sehbac.com" >double glazing</a> guy <img src='http://www.kevinboss.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: double glazing</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinboss.com/blog/most-ideal-size-for-your-web-site/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>double glazing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinboss.net/?p=20#comment-68</guid>
		<description>I think the size is realy important, yes 800 x 600 used to be perfect but as the price of monitors have come down most people who have any money to spend would have a nice pc and glazed moniter screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the size is realy important, yes 800 x 600 used to be perfect but as the price of monitors have come down most people who have any money to spend would have a nice pc and glazed moniter screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KabonFootprint</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinboss.com/blog/most-ideal-size-for-your-web-site/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>KabonFootprint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 04:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinboss.net/?p=20#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Web size is the most important part of creating website. Before we creating the design, i am always ask to the clients, what browser that they used, what is screen resolution the used.

But for the browser, i always do in Firefox first then the other browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Web size is the most important part of creating website. Before we creating the design, i am always ask to the clients, what browser that they used, what is screen resolution the used.</p>
<p>But for the browser, i always do in Firefox first then the other browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: collegeblogger</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinboss.com/blog/most-ideal-size-for-your-web-site/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>collegeblogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 20:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinboss.net/?p=20#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Makes sense, however I must agree that I do not like seeing sites that are stretched too wide and looking extremely weird.  Where is the happy medium?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Makes sense, however I must agree that I do not like seeing sites that are stretched too wide and looking extremely weird.  Where is the happy medium?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinboss.com/blog/most-ideal-size-for-your-web-site/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinboss.net/?p=20#comment-65</guid>
		<description>@Kevin: Ahh sprites, that&#039;s what they are called! I spent 5 minutes yesterday on Google trying to work out what they were called! Thanks for the article! ;)

And in reply to your twitter message (quite new to twitter myself, not sure how replies work), I think the compatibility is quite good, google uses it for its logos - http://www.google.co.uk/images/nav_logo3.png</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kevin: Ahh sprites, that&#8217;s what they are called! I spent 5 minutes yesterday on Google trying to work out what they were called! Thanks for the article! <img src='http://www.kevinboss.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>And in reply to your twitter message (quite new to twitter myself, not sure how replies work), I think the compatibility is quite good, google uses it for its logos &#8211; <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/images/nav_logo3.png" >http://www.google.co.uk/images/nav_logo3.png</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Boss</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinboss.com/blog/most-ideal-size-for-your-web-site/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Boss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 19:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinboss.net/?p=20#comment-64</guid>
		<description>@Ashley - If you&#039;re dealing with enough images, it&#039;s totally worth using sprites. Especially if you&#039;re serving pages to people on weak wireless signals. Here&#039;s a great article on the subject:
 http://css-tricks.com/css-sprites-what-they-are-why-theyre-cool-and-how-to-use-them/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ashley &#8211; If you&#8217;re dealing with enough images, it&#8217;s totally worth using sprites. Especially if you&#8217;re serving pages to people on weak wireless signals. Here&#8217;s a great article on the subject:<br />
 <a href="http://css-tricks.com/css-sprites-what-they-are-why-theyre-cool-and-how-to-use-them/" >http://css-tricks.com/css-sprites-what-they-are-why-theyre-cool-and-how-to-use-them/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

